<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innerpartysystem&#8217;s &#8220;Don&#8217;t Stop&#8221; Reinvented</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mm.jamiemarie.org/2009/01/12/innerpartysystems-dont-stop-reinvented/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mm.jamiemarie.org/2009/01/12/innerpartysystems-dont-stop-reinvented/</link>
	<description>thoughts about life, travel, and most of all music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: miss marie</title>
		<link>http://mm.jamiemarie.org/2009/01/12/innerpartysystems-dont-stop-reinvented/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>miss marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicmusing.com/?p=100#comment-30</guid>
		<description>@Deb I think that whole commentary in general was where the label was having problems.  It could have been, too, that rather than butcher the original vision to make a watered-down version, they decided to just make something entirely new to add to the whole story.

I imagine a lot of their hardcore fans will feel as you do, though.  All the way down to &quot;Still, love these guys.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deb I think that whole commentary in general was where the label was having problems.  It could have been, too, that rather than butcher the original vision to make a watered-down version, they decided to just make something entirely new to add to the whole story.</p>
<p>I imagine a lot of their hardcore fans will feel as you do, though.  All the way down to &#8220;Still, love these guys.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://mm.jamiemarie.org/2009/01/12/innerpartysystems-dont-stop-reinvented/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.musicmusing.com/?p=100#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. I dunno. I really liked the v1.0. I understand the need to go more mainstream, but this vid is almost cliched. Band images interspersed with a vague plot, destroying stuff on stage at the end. Haven&#039;t we seen that before?

The first vid was so frenetic and true to the song. Why couldn&#039;t then have kept some of that commentary and interspersed band performances in that one?

Still, love these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I dunno. I really liked the v1.0. I understand the need to go more mainstream, but this vid is almost cliched. Band images interspersed with a vague plot, destroying stuff on stage at the end. Haven&#8217;t we seen that before?</p>
<p>The first vid was so frenetic and true to the song. Why couldn&#8217;t then have kept some of that commentary and interspersed band performances in that one?</p>
<p>Still, love these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

